Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia
Articles
VIEWS: 1391
10.7454/jki.v7i2.132
Submitted: 2014-06-16

DAMPAK IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PRAKTIK KEPERAWATAN PROFESIONAL TERHADAP MUTU ASUHAN KEPERAWATAN DI RUMAH SAKIT

MPKP mutu asuhan keperawatan kebijakan pemerintah.

Abstract

Abstrak

Peningkatkan mutu asuhan keperawatan di rumah sakit memerlukan restructuring, reengineering, dan redesigning sistem pemberian asuhan keperawatan melalui implementasi Model Praktik Keperawatan Profesional (MPKP). Tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk menilai dampak implementasi MPKP terhadap mutu asuhan keperawatan di rumah sakit. Disain penelitian adalah kuasi eksperimen dalam bentuk pre and post test with control group. Uji statistik yang digunakan adalah uji Chi-square dan uji t. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada kelompok intervensi (MPKP) terdapat peningkatan kepuasan klien dan keluarga (OR=114,24) yang lebih besar dibandingkan dengan peningkatan kepuasan klien dan keluarga pada kelompok kontrol (OR=3,78). Demikian juga terdapat peningkatan kepatuhan perawat terhadap standar yang lebih tinggi pada kelompok intervensi (OR=235,5) dibandingkan dengan kelompok kontrol (OR=0). Lama hari rawat lebih pendek pada kelompok intervensi. Angka infeksi nosokomial juga lebih rendah pada kelompok intervensi dibandingkan dengan kelompok kontrol. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa implementasi MPKP dapat meningkatkan mutu asuhan keperawatan di rumah sakit. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, untuk memicu implementasi MPKP di berbagai rumah sakit, disarankan agar implementasi MPKP menjadi salah satu kriteria penilaian pada akreditasi rumah sakit khususnya pelayanan keperawatan

 

Abstract

In order to improve the quality of nursing care in the hospital, nursing care delivery system need restructuring, reengineering, and redesigning through the implementation of Professional Nursing Practice Model (PNPM). The study was aimed to evaluate the impact of the PNPM on the quality of nursing care in the hospital. The design used was quasi experiment in pre and post test with control group. The statistic used are Chi-square and t-test. The result showed that in the intervention group, the improvement of client/family satisfaction with nursing care (OR = 114,28) was higher than the improvement in the control group (OR = 3,78). It was founded there was an improvement of the compliance of nurses to the standard was higher in the intervention group (OR = 235,5) compare to control group (OR = 0). The length of stay shorter in the intervention group, and also the nosocomial infection rate is lower in the intervention group compare to control group. The study concluded that the implementation of the PNPM could improve the quality of nursing care in the hospital. Based on this result, in order to challenge the implementation of PNPM in the hospital it was suggested that the implementation of PNPM becomes an evaluation criteria for hospital accreditation specifically for nursing service.

References

  1. Al-Khandari, F. & Ogundeyen, W (1998). Patients and nurses perceptions of the quality of nursing care in Kuwait. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 27: 914 – 921.
  2. Blegen, M.A., Goode, C.J. & Reed, L. (1998). Nursing staffing and patient outcomes. Nursing Research, vol. 47:1, 43-50
  3. Clifford, J. C. & Horvath, K. J.(1990). Advancing profesional nursing practice: Innovations at Boston’s Beth Israel Hospital. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  4. Denker, A. J. (1998) The future and the next millennium. Nursing Administration Quarterly. Vol. 22(3), 62.
  5. Departemen Kesehatan R.I (1994). Pedoman Akreditasi Rumah Sakit di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bakti Husada.
  6. Donabedian, A. (1980). The definition of quality and approaches to its measurement health administration. Michigan: Press Ann Arbar.
  7. Dieter, D.C. (1996). Cost effectiveness and quality nursing Care. Journal for Advanced Nursing Practice. Vol. 10: 3, 153.
  8. Hamid, A.Y. (1998 ). Nilai-nilai profesional dalam praktik keperawatan. Disampaikan pada Seminar dan Lokakarya Model Praktik Keperawatan Profesional I, FIK-UI dan RSUPN. Cipto Mangunkusumo.
  9. Hoffart, N. & Woods, C.Q. (1996 ). Elements of a nursing professional practice models. Journal of professional nursing, vol. 12: 6, 354-364.
  10. Kozier, B., Erb, G., and Blais, K. (1997 ). Professional nursing practice, concepts, and perspective. California: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
  11. Lin, C.C (1996 ). Patient satisfaction with nursing care as an outcome variable: Dilemmas for nursing evaluation researchers. Journal of professional nursing. Vol. 12: (4) 207-216.
  12. Mc. Mahon, R., & Pearson, A (1993). Nursing as therapy. London: Chapman & Hall.
  13. Potter, P. A. and Perry, A. G (1997). Fundamentals of nursing: Concepts, process, and practice. St. Louis: Mosby.
  14. Sitorus, R. (2000). Mutu asuhan keperawatan di Indonesia dinilai berdasarkan kepuasan klien dan dokumentasi penerapan proses keperawatan. Tidak dipublikasikan.
  15. ___________, (2002). Pengembangan model praktik keperawatan profesional dan dampaknya terhadap mutu asuhan keperawatan di Rumah Sakit. Disertasi. Jakarta: FKM UI.
  16. Tonges, M.C. (1989). Redesigning hospital nursing practice: The professionally Advanced Care Team (ProACT) Model in Mayers, GG., Maddene, MJ., and Lawrenz, E. Maryland: An Aspen Publication.

How to Cite

Sitorus, R. (2003). DAMPAK IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PRAKTIK KEPERAWATAN PROFESIONAL TERHADAP MUTU ASUHAN KEPERAWATAN DI RUMAH SAKIT. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, 7(2), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v7i2.132