Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
VIEWS: 19
Published: 2025-07-31

The Effect of Nursing Process Education on Students’ Perceptions of Nursing Diagnoses

Faculty of Nursing, Near East University, Nicosia, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Mersin 10, Turkey
Faculty of Nursing, Near East University, Nicosia, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Mersin 10, Turkey
education nursing diagnosis nursing process nursing students perception

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of nursing process education on nursing students' perception of nursing diagnoses. This quasi-experimental study was conducted with the second-year students who took the course of internal medicine nursing. One hundred and eleven second-year students (91.72%) who were attending a nursing faculty were included in the pretest. Each of the training sessions given to the students lasted for 60 minutes, and a total of 12 sessions of training were applied as three sessions per week. The online training was given to students by an educator with a presentation and case discussion. Afterwards, the post-test was carried out with a total of 98 (73.68%) students. Data were collected by using a ‘Descriptive Characteristics Form’ and the ‘Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Survey’. In the statistical analysis of data, number, percentage, mean score and paired t-test were used. There was no statistical difference between the pretest and posttest total scores of the “Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Survey” before and after the online training for the nursing care plan process (p > 0.05). Students had a perception of nursing diagnoses at a moderate level. It was concluded that the case-based interventions had limited effects. The learning and use of the nursing diagnosis process by both nursing students and nurses facilitates its applicability in the field and makes it easier for nurses to provide more evidence-based care in the clinic. It is recommended that the teaching techniques used in the study be enriched and developed.

Keywords: education, nursing diagnosis, nursing process, nursing students, perception

 

Abstrak

Pengaruh Pendidikan Proses Keperawatan terhadap Persepsi Mahasiswa tentang Diagnosis Keperawatan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi pengaruh pendidikan proses keperawatan terhadap persepsi mahasiswa keperawatan tentang diagnosis keperawatan. Penelitian kuasi-eksperimental ini dilakukan pada mahasiswa tahun kedua yang mengambil mata kuliah keperawatan penyakit dalam. Seratus sebelas mahasiswa tahun kedua (91,72%) yang mengikuti pendidikan di fakultas keperawatan diikutsertakan dalam pre-test. Setiap sesi pelatihan yang diberikan kepada mahasiswa berlangsung selama 60 menit, dan total 12 sesi pelatihan diterapkan sebanyak tiga sesi per minggu. Pelatihan online diberikan kepada mahasiswa oleh seorang pendidik dengan presentasi dan diskusi kasus. Setelah itu, post-test dilakukan dengan total 98 (73,68%) mahasiswa. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan 'Formulir Karakteristik Deskriptif' dan 'Survei Persepsi Diagnosis Keperawatan'. Dalam analisis statistik data, jumlah, persentase, skor rata-rata dan uji-t berpasangan digunakan. Tidak ada perbedaan statistik antara skor total pre-test dan post-test dari “Survei Persepsi Diagnosis Keperawatan” sebelum dan sesudah pelatihan online untuk proses rencana asuhan keperawatan (p > 0,05). Mahasiswa memiliki persepsi tentang diagnosis keperawatan pada tingkat sedang. Disimpulkan bahwa intervensi berbasis kasus memiliki efek yang terbatas. Pembelajaran dan penggunaan proses diagnosis keperawatan oleh mahasiswa keperawatan dan perawat memfasilitasi penerapannya di lapangan dan memudahkan perawat untuk memberikan perawatan yang lebih berbasis bukti di klinik. Disarankan agar teknik pengajaran yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini diperkaya dan dikembangkan.

Kata Kunci: diagnosis keperawatan, mahasiswa keperawatan, pendidikan, persepsi, proses keperawatan

References

  1. Abdal, M., Alavi, N.M., & Adib-Hajbaghery, M. (2015). Clinical self-efficacy in senior nursing students: A mixed-methods study. Nursing and Midwifery Studies, 4 (3), e29143. doi: 10.17795/nmsjournal29143.
  2. Açıksöz, S., Uzun, Ş., & Arslan, F. (2016). Assessment of relationship between nursing students’ self-efficacy and levels of their anxiety and stress about clinical practice. Gülhane Medical Journal, 58 (2), 129–135. doi: 10.5455/gulhane.169643.
  3. Akın-Korhan, E., Hakverdioğlu-Yönt, G., Ak., B., & Erdemir, F. (2013). Hemşirelik tanılarını algılama ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliği [Analysis of Turkish validity and reliability of perception of nursing diagnosis]. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 15 (3), 13–25. doi: 10.69487/hemarge.695713.
  4. Ardahan, M., Ozsoy, S., Simsek, H., Savan, F., Taskiran, G., & Konal, E. (2019). The difficulties experienced by nursing students during the use of NANDA diagnoses in care management. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 12 (2),1130–1138.
  5. Baraki, Z., Girmay, F., Kidanu, K., Gerensea, H., Gezehgne, D., & Teklay, H. (2017). A cross-sectional study on nursing process implementation and associated factors among nurses working in selected hospitals of Central and Northwest zones, Tigray Region, Ethiopia. BMC Nursing, 16, 54. doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0248-9.
  6. Basit, G., & Korkmaz, F. (2021). The effect of web-based nursing process teaching on senior nursing students' care planning skills. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 32 (1), 4–19. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12283.
  7. Benedet, S.A., Padilha, M.I., Gelbke, F.L., & Bellaguarda, M.L.D.R. (2018). The model professionalism in the implementation of the nursing process (1979-2004). Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 71 (4), 1907–1914. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0226.
  8. Carless-Kane, S., & Nowell, L. (2023). Nursing students learning transfer from classroom to clinical practice: An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice, 71, 103731. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103731.
  9. Cengiz, Z., Gurdap, Z., & Işik, K. (2022). Challenges experienced by nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 58 (1), 47–53. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12923.
  10. Dikeç, G., Karakurt, S., Bayram, A., Zeybek, B., & Dağlı, D. (2017). Sağlık meslek lisesi son sınıf öğrencilerinin hemşirelik mesleğine ilişkin düşünceleri [Opinions of senior students of a vocational health high school about profession of nursing]. Sağlik ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi, 4 (3), 127–135. doi: 10.5222/SHYD.2017.127.
  11. Erer, M.T., Akbas, M., & Yıldırım, G. (2017). Hemşirelik sürecinin evrimsel gelişimi hemşirelik süreci [Evolutionary development of nursing process]. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi, 7 (1), 1–5.
  12. Frost, M., Olsen, G., & Orth, K. (1991). Perceptions of nursing diagnosis survey: Instrument development. [Unpublished manuscript]. Winona State University, Minnesota, United States.
  13. Karaca, T., & Aslan, S. (2018). Effect of ‘nursing terminologies and classifications’ course on nursing students' perception of nursing diagnosis. Nurse Education Today, 67, 114–117. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.011.
  14. Karakurt, P., Ünsal, A., & Yıldırım, S. (2020). Hemşirelerin hemşirelik tanılarına yönelik algılarının bazı değişkenler yönünden incelenmesi: Bir şehir hastanesi örneği [Assessing nurses' perceptions towards nursing diagnosis in some variables: An example of city hospital]. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 36 (3), 153–161.
  15. Kavurmacı, M., Tan, M., Arıkan, D., & Yıldız, İ. (2021). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin lisansüstü eğitime ve kariyer planlamaya yönelik görüşlerinin belirlenmesi [Determination of nursing students’ views on graduate education and career planning]. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 24 (2), 192–201. doi: 10.17049/ataunihem.645821.
  16. Köse, S., & Çelik, A.S. (2020). Hemşirelerin hemşirelik tanılarını algılama durumlarının ve etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi [Determination of the nursing perceptions towards nursing diagnosis and affecting factors]. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi, 3 (3), 244–253. doi: 10.38108/ouhcd.785110.
  17. Kurtgöz, A., & Yılmaz, M.Ç. (2023). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin hemşirelik tanılarını algılama düzeyleri ile klinik performanslarına ilişkin öz yeterliklerinin belirlenmesi [Determination of nursing students' level of perception of nursing diagnoses and self-efficacy regarding their clinical performance]. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi, 6 (3), 739–748. doi: 10.38108/ouhcd.1167475.
  18. Löfgren, U., Wälivaara, B.M., Strömbäck, U., & Lindberg, B. (2023). The nursing process: A supportive model for nursing students' learning during clinical education - A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 72, 103747. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103747.
  19. Lotfi, M., Zamanzadeh, V., Valizadeh, L., Khajehgoodari, M., Rezaei, M.E., & Khalilzad, M.A. (2019). The implementation of the nursing process in lower-income countries: An integrative review. Nursing Open, 7 (1), 42–57. doi: 10.1002/nop2.410.
  20. Melin-Johansson, C., Palmqvist, R., & Rönnberg, L. (2017). Clinical intuition in the nursing process and decision‐making-A mixed‐studies review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26 (23-24), 3936–3949. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13814.
  21. Melita-Rodriguez, A., Jara-Concha, P., & Moreno-Monsivais, M.G. (2021). Percepción de pacientes hospitalizados en unidades medico quirúrgicas sobre el cuidado humanizado de enfermería [Perception of hospitalized patients in medical surgical units on humanized nursing care]. Enfermería: Cuidados Humanizados, 10 (1), 89–105. doi: 10.22235/ech.v10i1.2481.
  22. Mohamadirizi, S., Kohan, S., Shafei, F., & Mohamadirizi, S. (2015). The relationship between clinical competence and clinical self-efficacy among nursing and midwifery students. Journal of Pediatric Perspectives, 3 (6.2), 1117–1123. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2015.5222.
  23. Mousavizadeh S.N. (2022). The experiences of nursing students using virtual education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medicine and Life, 15 (9), 1090–1095. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0315.
  24. Olğun, S., & Adıbelli, D. (2020). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin meslek seçimini etkileyen faktörler [Factors affecting/influencing career choices of nursing students]. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 11 (1), 55–60. doi: 10.31067/0.2020.242.
  25. Olmaz, D., & Karakurt, P. (2019). Hemşirelerin bakım verirken hemşirelik sürecini bilme ve uygulama durumları [The extent to which nurses knowledge and apply the nursing process when giving care]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 12 (1), 3–14.
  26. Özdelikara, A., Ağaçdiken, S., & Aydın, E. (2016). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin meslek seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler [Career choices of nursing students and influencing factors]. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2, 83–88.
  27. Pai, H.C., Ko, H.L., Eng, C.J., & Yen, W.J. (2017). The mediating effect of self-reflection and learning effectiveness on clinical nursing performance in nursing students: A follow-up study. Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 33 (4), 287–292. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.01.003.
  28. Pozam, M., & Zaybak, A. (2016). Klinik performansta öz-yeterlik ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi [Adaptation of self-efficacy scale in clinical performance scale into Turkish and examination of psychometric properties]. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 32 (3), 100–117.
  29. Şahin, M., & Khorshid, L. (2021). Hemşirelik süreci eğitimin hemşirelik tanılarını algılama üzerine etkisi [The effect of nursing process education on perception of nursing diagnosis]. İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 6 (2), 15–19.
  30. Shahsavari, H., Ghiyasvandian, S., Houser, M.L., Zakerimoghadam, M., Kermanshahi, S.S.N., & Torabi, S. (2017). Effect of a clinical skills refresher course on the clinical performance, anxiety and self-efficacy of the final year undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 27, 151–156. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.006.
  31. Yıkar, S.K., Doğan, S.D., Aydıngülü, N., Arslan, S., & Nazik, E. (2020). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin tutumlarının belirlenmesi: Çukurova Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi örneği [Determining nursing students' attitudes towards gender roles: The case of Çukurova University Faculty of Health Sciences]. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi, 3 (2), 104–113. doi: 10.38108/ouhcd.704397.
  32. Yılmaz, A.A., Gençer, E., Seçkin, Ç., Akyüz, H., Güven, K.T., & Gozutok, S. (2019). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin hemşirelik sürecinin veri toplama aşamasına ilişkin görüşleri ve yaşadıkları güçlükler [Difficulties experienced by nursing students on the data collection step of the nursing process]. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 22 (4), 231–238. doi: 10.17049/ataunihem.439074.
  33. Yilmaz, F.T., Sabanciogullari, S., & Aldemir, K. (2015). The opinions of nursing students regarding the nursing process and their levels of proficiency in Turkey. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4 (4), 265–275. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.027.
  34. Yurtsever, İ., & Karagözoğlu, Ş. (2020). Bir üniversite hastanesinde çalışan hemşirelerin hastanede kullanılan hemşirelik bakım planını iyileştirme konusundaki görüş ve önerileri: Karma modelde bir çalışma [The views and suggestions of nurses working at a university hospital on improving the nursing care plan used in the hospital: A mixed-model study]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (3), 215–225. doi: 10.31125/hunhemsire.834055.
  35. Zamanzadeh, V., Valizadeh, L., Tabrizi, F.J., Behshid, M., & Lotfi, M. (2015). Challenges associated with the implementation of the nursing process: A systematic review. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 20 (4), 411–419. doi: 10.4103/1735-9066.161002.

How to Cite

Bağrıaçık, E., & Dikmen, B. T. (2025). The Effect of Nursing Process Education on Students’ Perceptions of Nursing Diagnoses. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, 28(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v28i2.1445